When adhering to judging principles, what should not differ among teams?

In a judging process, it is crucial that all teams are evaluated using the same set of evaluation criteria. This consistency ensures fairness and equity in the judging process, allowing judges to assess each team's performance based on the same standards. When evaluation criteria remain uniform, it minimizes bias and subjectivity, providing a level playing field where all teams' strengths and weaknesses can be judged fairly.

Using the same evaluation criteria means that judges can compare performances accurately and make informed decisions based on consistent benchmarks. This approach is standard in competitions to ensure that every participant understands what is expected and how they will be assessed.

In contrast, variations in the quality of submissions, judge experience, or presentation formats can inherently introduce discrepancies in how teams are evaluated and affect the integrity of the competition. Therefore, maintaining uniform evaluation criteria is fundamental to an equitable judging process.