What should a Judge Advisor include in reports regarding discrepancies found during judging?

Including detailed observations and rationale for discrepancies in reports is essential for several reasons. First, it provides clarity and an objective basis for understanding the nature of the discrepancies identified during judging. When discrepancies occur, judges need to have a comprehensive understanding of what went wrong and the context behind it to make informed decisions moving forward.

Detailed observations are critical for transparency as they allow for the evaluation of judging performance and the judging process itself. It enables the identification of patterns that can inform future training or adjustments to judging criteria. Rationale helps to communicate the seriousness of the discrepancies and supports any necessary actions or recommendations that may follow.

Moreover, detailed reporting fosters a culture of accountability and continuous improvement within the judging community. It ensures that feedback is constructive and focused on growth, which ultimately contributes to enhancing the quality of the judging process in the future.