What is a key reason why evaluating Engineering Notebooks under dissimilar conditions contradicts the principle of "Consistency" in judging?

Evaluating Engineering Notebooks under dissimilar conditions undermines the principle of "Consistency" because fairness in competition is achieved when all participants are judged by the same standards and criteria. When submissions are evaluated in varying conditions, it introduces discrepancies that can lead to unequal treatment of teams. This inconsistency can affect how participants perceive the judging process and diminish their confidence in the competition.

This lack of fairness can create an environment where some participants may inadvertently receive advantages or disadvantages, based solely on the conditions under which their work is evaluated. Instead of fostering a level playing field, inconsistent judging criteria can result in outcomes that are not reflective of the actual work and creativity demonstrated by the individuals or teams. Therefore, maintaining consistent evaluation conditions is essential for upholding the integrity of the judging process and ensuring that all participants feel their efforts are being fairly assessed.