What is a best practice for delivering feedback to judges?

Providing feedback in a timely, respectful, and constructive manner is essential for fostering a positive environment where judges can improve their skills and performance. Timeliness ensures that the feedback is relevant and related to recent actions, allowing judges to remember the context and make necessary adjustments quickly.

Respectful communication is crucial as it promotes openness and receptiveness to feedback, making judges feel valued rather than defensive. Constructive feedback helps judges understand not just what needs to change, but also how they can make those changes effectively. This balanced approach encourages personal and professional growth without damaging the relationship between judges and their advisors.

Other options lack this balanced approach; avoiding direct confrontation doesn't facilitate growth, while scheduling feedback only at the end of the season misses opportunities for timely adjustments. Prioritizing negative feedback tends to create a negative atmosphere and can demoralize judges, making them less receptive to feedback overall. Hence, the recommended practice emphasizes a constructive and supportive feedback process.