Certified Judge Advisor Practice Test

What happens if a discrepancy in scoring arises during judging?

1. Judges must ignore it

2. It should be documented for review

3. Top judges will make the final decision

4. Scores cannot be changed after submission

The correct answer is: It should be documented for review

When a discrepancy in scoring arises during judging, the best course of action is to document the situation for review. This approach ensures that there is a formal record of the inconsistency, which can be referenced later for resolution. Documenting the issue allows for transparency and accountability in the judging process, enabling the review committee or organizing body to investigate the discrepancy thoroughly. This practice is essential because it upholds the integrity of the judging process. If judges were to simply ignore the discrepancy, it could lead to unfair outcomes and undermine the trust in the scoring system. Additionally, having top judges make a final decision may not always be feasible or in line with established procedures, and saying that scores cannot be changed after submission does not account for the need to address legitimate scoring errors or misunderstandings. Therefore, documenting discrepancies for review is a systematic way to handle issues that arise during judging.