What could be a potential consequence of evaluating some notebooks digitally and others physically?

The potential consequence of evaluating some notebooks digitally while others are assessed physically is the likelihood of inconsistency in how the notebooks are evaluated. Different methods of evaluation can lead to variations in standards, criteria, and even subjective interpretations by the evaluators. For example, a digital evaluation might allow for certain features, such as automated consistency checks and digital annotations, which are not present in a physical review. This discrepancy can create situations where similar submissions receive different evaluations based solely on the format used, which undermines the fairness and reliability of the assessment process.

In contrast, evaluating all submissions using a single method—either all digital or all physical—would provide a more uniform approach. Such consistency is crucial for ensuring that all participants are judged by the same criteria, leading to a more equitable competition.