If a judge insists on a specific team winning, how should the Judge Advisor respond?

The appropriate response for a Judge Advisor when a judge insists on a specific team winning is to focus discussions on established award criteria. This approach emphasizes a fair and unbiased evaluation of each team's performance based on previously agreed-upon criteria rather than personal opinions.

By redirecting the conversation to the criteria set for awards, the Judge Advisor ensures that decisions are made objectively and collaboratively, promoting transparency in the judging process. This method encourages all judges to evaluate based on the merits of each team and contributes to a more equitable competition environment. It is essential for maintaining the integrity of the judging process and fostering a collegial atmosphere among the judges.